Comment
01 Jan 2003
One idea is "to give to the European MIA's some form of European grouping within ICOMIA".
This is a path many have urged for ICOMIA in the past, stressing that the European marine industry needs its own voice on the world stage and - more especially - in Brussels.
Howard Pridding, executive director of the British Marine Federation (BMF) says he welcomes the move and feels closer links with the UK's European neighbours will help maximise the industry's impact on the EU's regulators.
But how can ICOMIA fight for the European cause in, say, the steel dispute with the USA, when it also has the National Marine Manufacturers' Association (NMMA) as a member?
David Lewin, the UK's representative at ICOMIA and a member of its executive committee, says the details have not yet been worked out, but ICOMIA will avoid setting up a European committee, fearing it may split the organisation.
Instead, there is likely to be a coordinator for Europe. "Any conflict of interest would be put to the executive committee for a view, " said Lewin.
According to Barbleu, there is no conflict. "The marine industry does not want barriers or limitations and we agree on this on both sides of the Atlantic."
At face value, this sounds fine. But it requires that all MIAs act for the greater good of the ICOMIA cause and not necessarily follow its government party line in trade disputes.
As each MIA relies on its government for support, grants and help, there is - again - the possibility for conflicts of interest.
That the European marine industry needs a strong voice in Brussels is undeniable.
Let's hope domestic politics can be kept out of the equation.
Related products
For more information on products mentioned within this article visit






