While BW has kept a diplomatic silence, the IWA has been openly enthusiastic about the appointment of Jonathan Shaw in place of Barry Gardiner. Shaw promises good communications between DEFRA and BW and will consider the EFRA committee recommendations on funding of BW.

The EFRA Committee report concludes that BW generally does a good job and calls for the National Audit Office (NAO) to look at BW finances, noting that a £35m cut in funding over three years will adversely affect maintenance of the waterways network.

The EFRA report notes that most canal users do not contribute financially, despite causing wear and tear, something government funding should take into consideration, as should the unfunded flood protection work undertaken on the inland waterways.

An environmental heritage strategy should be established and the IWA wants to see free waterways museum entry enabled.

BW does receive some rebuke over its lack of transparency and the way it relates to its stakeholders. In particular, the proposed tendering process for moorings, leading to higher costs and exclusivity, is not welcomed.

It’s suggested mooring and licence fees should be held at a level to encourage individual participation.